Morgan v. State
674 So. 2d 188, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5443, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1245
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morgan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 700 So. 2d 29 →
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence. We strike, however, the assessment for the Hillsborough County Court Improvement Fund, Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc), as well as the improper imposition of costs of prosecution. Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). On remand, the state may seek to reimpose prosecution costs. Id.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morgan v. State, 674 So. 2d 188, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5443, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1245 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
674 So. 2d 188 (Morgan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Sutton v. State
635 So. 2d 1032 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)