Moore v. State

68 S.E. 616, 8 Ga. App. 113, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 60
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 25, 1910
Docket2542
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 68 S.E. 616 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. State, 68 S.E. 616, 8 Ga. App. 113, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 60 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Russell, J.

The evidence was insufficient to authorize the conviction of the defendant, and a new trial should have been granted. The decision is controlled by the ruling in Thompson v. State, 5 Ga. App. 7 (62 S. E. 571), and Winkles v. State, 4 Ga. App. 559 (2), 563 (61 S. E. 1128).

Judgment reversed.

8. IIolderness, J. O. Newell, Edgar Watkins, for plaintiff in error, cited: 5 Ga. App. 7; Id. 176; 2 Ga. App. 620; 84 Ga. 461; 74 Ga. 376; 126 Ga. 563. C. E. Roop, solicitor, contra, cited: 97 Ga. 192; 81 Ga. 140 (6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips v. State
88 S.E. 716 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
O'Neal v. State
83 S.E. 861 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Cummings v. State
81 S.E. 366 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Bailey v. State
77 S.E. 652 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Seckinger v. State
76 S.E. 167 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 S.E. 616, 8 Ga. App. 113, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-state-gactapp-1910.