Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Moore v. State

Moore v. State

68 S.E. 616, 8 Ga. App. 113, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 60
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 25, 1910·No. 2542·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

The evidence was insufficient to authorize the conviction of the defendant, and a new trial should have been granted. The decision is controlled by the ruling in Thompson v. State, 5 Ga. App. 7 (62 S. E. 571), and Winkles v. State, 4 Ga. App. 559 (2), 563 (61 S. E. 1128).

Judgment reversed.

8. IIolderness, J. O. Newell, Edgar Watkins, for plaintiff in error, cited: 5 Ga. App. 7; Id. 176; 2 Ga. App. 620; 84 Ga. 461; 74 Ga. 376; 126 Ga. 563. C. E. Roop, solicitor, contra, cited: 97 Ga. 192; 81 Ga. 140 (6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. State, 68 S.E. 616, 8 Ga. App. 113, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 60 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

68 S.E. 616 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phillips v. State
88 S.E. 716 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
O'Neal v. State
83 S.E. 861 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Cummings v. State
81 S.E. 366 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Bailey v. State
77 S.E. 652 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Seckinger v. State
76 S.E. 167 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)