Seckinger v. State
76 S.E. 167, 11 Ga. App. 797, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 186
Opinion
The evidence in support of the verdict was entirely circumstantial, and, weighed most strongly against the accused, raised only a bare suspicion of his guilt, and was consistent with his innocence. The verdict was therefore unauthorized by law. Winkles v. State, 4 Ga. App. 559 (61 S. E. 1128) ; Thompson v. State, 5 Ga. App. 7 (62 S. E. 571); Moore v. State, 8 Ga. App. 113 (68 S. E. 616).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seckinger v. State, 76 S.E. 167, 11 Ga. App. 797, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 186 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
76 S.E. 167 (Seckinger v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Phillips v. State
88 S.E. 716 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)