Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Bailey v. State

Bailey v. State

77 S.E. 652, 12 Ga. App. 529, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 623
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 18, 1913
Docket4309
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 77 S.E. 652 (Bailey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. State, 77 S.E. 652, 12 Ga. App. 529, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 623 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Russell, J.

There being no evidence sufficient to authorize conviction, the verdict finding the accused guilty was contrary to law. Thompson v. State, 5 Ga. App. 7 (62 S. E. 571); Moore v. State, 8 Ga. App. 113 (68 S. E. 616). Judgment reversed.

O. B. Garlick, F. S. Burney, for plaintiff in error, cited the cases cited in the decision. J. S. Reynolds, solicitor-general, J ohn M. Graham, contra, cited: 81 Ga. 140 (6), 143-144; 81 Ga. 144 (4); 6 Ga. App. 554 (3), 558, and cit.; 119 Ga. 448; 97 Ga. 192.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips v. State
88 S.E. 716 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Cummings v. State
81 S.E. 366 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 S.E. 652, 12 Ga. App. 529, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-state-gactapp-1913.