Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Bailey v. State

Bailey v. State

77 S.E. 652, 12 Ga. App. 529, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 623
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 18, 1913·No. 4309·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

There being no evidence sufficient to authorize conviction, the verdict finding the accused guilty was contrary to law. Thompson v. State, 5 Ga. App. 7 (62 S. E. 571); Moore v. State, 8 Ga. App. 113 (68 S. E. 616). Judgment reversed.

O. B. Garlick, F. S. Burney, for plaintiff in error, cited the cases cited in the decision. J. S. Reynolds, solicitor-general, J ohn M. Graham, contra, cited: 81 Ga. 140 (6), 143-144; 81 Ga. 144 (4); 6 Ga. App. 554 (3), 558, and cit.; 119 Ga. 448; 97 Ga. 192.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. State, 77 S.E. 652, 12 Ga. App. 529, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 623 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

77 S.E. 652 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phillips v. State
88 S.E. 716 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Cummings v. State
81 S.E. 366 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)