Eldridge v. State
23 S.E. 832, 97 Ga. 192
Opinions
The evidence in this case, though entirely circumstantial, was sufficient to warrant the conviction; and the verdict of guilty having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not overrule his refusal to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eldridge v. State, 23 S.E. 832, 97 Ga. 192 (Ga. 1895).
23 S.E. 832 (Eldridge v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mack v. Mack
234 Ga. 692 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Johnson v. State
141 S.E.2d 574 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Hathcock v. State
195 S.E. 308 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
State v. Richardson
50 P.2d 1012 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1935)
Harrison v. Odum
96 S.E. 1038 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
O'Neal v. State
83 S.E. 861 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Bailey v. State
77 S.E. 652 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Moore v. State
68 S.E. 616 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
State v. Thompson
111 N.W. 319 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1907)
Sutton v. State
53 S.E. 381 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Johnson v. State
46 S.E. 634 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)