Moore, Marsh & Co. v. Medlock
This text of 38 S.E. 825 (Moore, Marsh & Co. v. Medlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. This court will not review the evidence in a case in which it is apparent from the record that there has been no bona fide effort made to brief the evidence as required by law, and when the document purporting to be a brief of the evidence is no brief at all, but a needlessly voluminous paper, abounding in repetition and much totally useless and irrelevant matter. Price v. High, 108 Ga. 145 ; Ansley v. Davidson, 110 Ga. 279; Buchanan v. McClain, 110 Ga. 479; McLeod v. Railroad Co., 111 Ga. 859.
2. Where in such a case no question is presented which can be determined without reference to the evidence, the judgment below must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 S.E. 825, 113 Ga. 259, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-marsh-co-v-medlock-ga-1901.