Ansley v. Davidson & Co.
This text of 34 S.E. 611 (Ansley v. Davidson & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was no brief of the evidence in this case, nor bona fide attempt to make one. The document purporting to be such was a detailed report of the trial, including, without even the appearance of necessity, all manner of useless and irrelevant matter. Accordingly, this court will not review the evidence; and as no question is presented by the bill of exceptions which can be intelligently considered and passed upon without reference to the evidence, the judgment below must be affirmed. Southern Mining Company v. Brown, 107 Ga. 264; Price v. High cG Co., 108 Ga. 145, and cases therein cited. If any error was committed at the trial below, the plaintiff in error has not, as it was incumbent upon him to do, affirmatively, and in the manner prescribed by law, so shown to this court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 S.E. 611, 110 Ga. 279, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ansley-v-davidson-co-ga-1899.