Culver v. Silver
This text of 39 S.E. 472 (Culver v. Silver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. This court will not review the evidence in a case when it is-apparent that there has been no bona fide effort to brief the evidence as required by law, and when the document purporting to be a brief of the evidence is extensively interspersed with objections to testimony, statements and arguments of counsel, and evidence to which objections were sustained, and also with colloquies between counsel and court, none of which should properly find place in a brief of evidence. Price v. High, 108 Ga. 145; Moore v. Medlock, 113 Ga. 259.
2. Where in such a case no question is presented for decision which can be determined without reference to the evidence, the judgment below must be affirmed. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 S.E. 472, 113 Ga. 1142, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/culver-v-silver-ga-1901.