Equitable Mortgage Co. v. Bell
This text of 42 S.E. 82 (Equitable Mortgage Co. v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. This court will not review evidence when it is apparent that there has been no bona fide effort to brief it as required by law, and when the document purporting to be a brief of the evidence is extensively interspersed with objections to testimony, statements and arguments of counsel, and rulings of the court, none of which should find place in a brief of evidence. Culver v. Silver, 113 Ga. 1142, and cases cited.
2. In so far as the questions presented for decision can be determined without reference to the evidence, there was no error in the rulings complained of.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 S.E. 82, 115 Ga. 651, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/equitable-mortgage-co-v-bell-ga-1902.