Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Upshaw
42 S.E. 82, 115 Ga. 688, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 532
Opinion
1. The document filed as a brief of the evidence shows clearly that there was no bona fide effort to brief the evidence as is required by the statute, and this court will not consider it. Equitable Mortgage Co. v. Bell, 115 Ga. 651.
2. No question is presented which can be decided without reference to the evidence, and the judgment of the court below must accordingly be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Upshaw, 42 S.E. 82, 115 Ga. 688, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 532 (Ga. 1902).
42 S.E. 82 (Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Upshaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boston Insurance Co. v. Harmon
18 S.E.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Progressive Life Insurance v. Wallace
6 S.E.2d 384 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Lane v. Williams
44 S.E. 993 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Griffin v. State
42 S.E. 752 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)