McLeod v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia

McLeod v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad

36 S.E. 965, 111 Ga. 859, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 839

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedAugust 7, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 36 S.E. 965 (McLeod v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McLeod v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad, 36 S.E. 965, 111 Ga. 859, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 839 (Ga. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Fish, J.

Where the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is that the court erred in granting a nonsuit, and it appears from the record that no bona fide effort has been made to brief the evidence as the law requires, this court, without considering the evidence, will assume that .the judgment of the court below was correct, and affirm it. Price v. High, 108 Ga. 145; Carmichael v. State, ante, 653.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Action for damages. Before Judge Seabrook. Effingham superior court. November term, 1899.

D. H. Clark, for plaintiff. Denmark, Adams & Freeman, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI