McLeod v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad
36 S.E. 965, 111 Ga. 859, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 839
Opinion
Where the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is that the court erred in granting a nonsuit, and it appears from the record that no bona fide effort has been made to brief the evidence as the law requires, this court, without considering the evidence, will assume that .the judgment of the court below was correct, and affirm it. Price v. High, 108 Ga. 145; Carmichael v. State, ante, 653.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McLeod v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad, 36 S.E. 965, 111 Ga. 859, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 839 (Ga. 1900).
36 S.E. 965 (McLeod v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roberts v. City of Cairo
66 S.E. 938 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Fleming v. Roberts
40 S.E. 792 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Moore, Marsh & Co. v. Medlock
38 S.E. 825 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)