McLeod v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad

36 S.E. 965, 111 Ga. 859, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 839
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 7, 1900·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Fish, J.

Where the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is that the court erred in granting a nonsuit, and it appears from the record that no bona fide effort has been made to brief the evidence as the law requires, this court, without considering the evidence, will assume that .the judgment of the court below was correct, and affirm it. Price v. High, 108 Ga. 145; Carmichael v. State, ante, 653.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Action for damages. Before Judge Seabrook. Effingham superior court. November term, 1899. D. H. Clark, for plaintiff. Denmark, Adams & Freeman, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLeod v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad, 36 S.E. 965, 111 Ga. 859, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 839 (Ga. 1900).

36 S.E. 965 (McLeod v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. City of Cairo
66 S.E. 938 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Fleming v. Roberts
40 S.E. 792 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Moore, Marsh & Co. v. Medlock
38 S.E. 825 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)