Moises Mendoza v. William Stephens, Director

783 F.3d 203, 2015 WL 1472131
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 30, 2015·No. 12-70035·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

We GRANT the motion for the appointment of new supplemental counsel. We REMAND THIS CASE IN PART to the district court solely to appoint supplemental counsel consistent with this opinion and the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3599, and to consider in the first instance whether the petitioner can establish cause for the procedural default of any ineffeetive-assistance-of-trial-counsel claims pursuant to Martinez and Trevino that he may raise, and if so, whether those claims merit relief. We retain jurisdiction in the remainder of the case and STAY proceedings [204]*204pending the conclusion of the district court’s review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moises Mendoza v. William Stephens, Director, 783 F.3d 203, 2015 WL 1472131 (5th Cir. 2015).

783 F.3d 203 (Moises Mendoza v. William Stephens, Director) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RITCHIE v. WILSON
S.D. Indiana, 2025
Mendoza v. Lumpkin
81 F.4th 461 (Fifth Circuit, 2023)
Ray Freeney v. Lorie Davis, Director
703 F. App'x 304 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
Troy Clark v. Lorie Davis, Director
850 F.3d 770 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
In Re: Terry Edwards
Fifth Circuit, 2017
Terry Edwards v. Lorie Davis, Director
865 F.3d 197 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
Robert Pruett v. William Stephens, Director
608 F. App'x 182 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)
William Speer v. William Stephens, Director
781 F.3d 784 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)