FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 133

Determination

28 U.S.C. § 2106
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter133 — REVIEW—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (Determination) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2106.

Text

The Supreme Court or any other court of appellate jurisdiction may affirm, modify, vacate, set aside or reverse any judgment, decree, or order of a court lawfully brought before it for review, and may remand the cause and direct the entry of such appropriate judgment, decree, or order, or require such further proceedings to be had as may be just under the circumstances.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yates v. United States
354 U.S. 298 (Supreme Court, 1957)
1,267 case citations
Grosso v. United States
390 U.S. 62 (Supreme Court, 1968)
947 case citations
Susan D. Goland and Patricia B. Skidmore v. Central Intelligence Agency
607 F.2d 339 (D.C. Circuit, 1978)
813 case citations
Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice
705 F.2d 1344 (D.C. Circuit, 1983)
697 case citations
Haynes v. United States
390 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 1968)
599 case citations
Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.
546 U.S. 394 (Supreme Court, 2006)
504 case citations
International Harvester Co. v. Ruckelshaus
478 F.2d 615 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
253 case citations
Forman v. United States
361 U.S. 416 (Supreme Court, 1960)
238 case citations
United States v. Juan Rubio-Villareal
967 F.2d 294 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
141 case citations
Hudson United Bank v. Litenda Mortgage Corp.
142 F.3d 151 (Third Circuit, 1998)
108 case citations
Cleveland Brown v. Michael J. Crowley
312 F.3d 782 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
83 case citations
Microsoftware Computer Systems, Inc. v. Ontel Corporation
686 F.2d 531 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
76 case citations
State v. Laws
242 A.2d 333 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1968)
75 case citations
United States v. Robert L. Pinkney
551 F.2d 1241 (D.C. Circuit, 1976)
66 case citations
Reynolds v. Roberts
207 F.3d 1288 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)
62 case citations
United States v. Terry Lynn Winters
174 F.3d 478 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
50 case citations
Boyd v. Bulala
905 F.2d 764 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)
48 case citations
Jose Alonzo Corpus v. Tony Bennett
430 F.3d 912 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
26 case citations
Marvin Gabrion, II v. United States
43 F.4th 569 (Sixth Circuit, 2022)
20 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 963.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§344, 876, 877 (R.S. §701; Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 517, §§10, 11, 26 Stat. 829; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§231, 236, 237, 291, 36 Stat. 1156, 1167; Dec. 23, 1914, ch. 2, 38 Stat. 790; Sept. 16, 1916, ch. 448, §2, 39 Stat. 726; Feb. 17, 1922, ch. 54, 42 Stat. 366; Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, §1, 43 Stat. 937; Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, §1, 45 Stat. 54).
Section consolidates part of section 344 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with sections 876 and 877 of said title. Other provisions of said section 344 are incorporated in sections 1257 and 2103 of this title.
Words "or a court of appeals" were inserted after "Supreme Court" upon authority of United States v. Illinois Surety Co., C.C.A. 1915, 226 F. 653, affirmed 37 S.Ct. 614, 244 U.S. 376, 61 L.Ed. 1206, wherein it was held that this section also applied to the courts of appeals in view of section 11 of the Circuit Court of Appeals Act of Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 517, 28 Stat. 829.
The revised section will cover instances where the Supreme Court remands a case to the highest court of a State and to the United States Tax Court. It will also cover a remand of a case to the Court of Claims or the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. For authority to remand a case to The Tax Court, see Equitable Life Assurance Society of U.S. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1944, 64 S.Ct. 722, 321 U.S. 560, 88 L.Ed. 927.
Revised section will also permit a remand by the Supreme Court to a court of appeals inasmuch as such latter court then would be a lower court. The revised section is in conformity with numerous holdings of the Supreme Court to the effect that such a remand may be made. See especially, Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States, 1929, 49 S.Ct. 484, 279 U.S. 792, 73 L.Ed. 960; Krauss Bros. Co. v. Mellon, 1928, 48 S.Ct. 358, 276 U.S. 386, 72 L.Ed. 620 and Buzyuski v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 1928, 48 S.Ct. 440, 277 U.S. 226, 72 L.Ed. 860.
The last sentence of section 876 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., providing that the Supreme Court should not issue execution but should send a special mandate to the inferior court to award execution, was omitted. See rule 34 of the revised rules of the Supreme Court relating to Mandates, and section 1651 of this title authorizing the Supreme Court to issue all writs necessary in aid of its jurisdiction.
Changes were made in phraseology.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2106.