FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 133
Determination
28 U.S.C. § 2106
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter133 — REVIEW—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (Determination) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2106.
Text
The Supreme Court or any other court of appellate jurisdiction may affirm, modify, vacate, set aside or reverse any judgment, decree, or order of a court lawfully brought before it for review, and may remand the cause and direct the entry of such appropriate judgment, decree, or order, or require such further proceedings to be had as may be just under the circumstances.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Yates v. United States
354 U.S. 298 (Supreme Court, 1957)
Grosso v. United States
390 U.S. 62 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Susan D. Goland and Patricia B. Skidmore v. Central Intelligence Agency
607 F.2d 339 (D.C. Circuit, 1978)
Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice
705 F.2d 1344 (D.C. Circuit, 1983)
Haynes v. United States
390 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.
546 U.S. 394 (Supreme Court, 2006)
Patricia Scott v. Clay County, Tennessee Chinn Anderson Billy Pierce Michael Thompson
205 F.3d 867 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
International Harvester Co. v. Ruckelshaus
478 F.2d 615 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
Forman v. United States
361 U.S. 416 (Supreme Court, 1960)
United States v. Juan Rubio-Villareal
967 F.2d 294 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Hudson United Bank v. Litenda Mortgage Corp.
142 F.3d 151 (Third Circuit, 1998)
Cleveland Brown v. Michael J. Crowley
312 F.3d 782 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
Microsoftware Computer Systems, Inc. v. Ontel Corporation
686 F.2d 531 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
State v. Laws
242 A.2d 333 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1968)
United States v. Robert L. Pinkney
551 F.2d 1241 (D.C. Circuit, 1976)
Reynolds v. Roberts
207 F.3d 1288 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Terry Lynn Winters
174 F.3d 478 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
Boyd v. Bulala
905 F.2d 764 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)
Jose Alonzo Corpus v. Tony Bennett
430 F.3d 912 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
Marvin Gabrion, II v. United States
43 F.4th 569 (Sixth Circuit, 2022)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 963.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§344, 876, 877 (R.S. §701; Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 517, §§10, 11, 26 Stat. 829; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§231, 236, 237, 291, 36 Stat. 1156, 1167; Dec. 23, 1914, ch. 2, 38 Stat. 790; Sept. 16, 1916, ch. 448, §2, 39 Stat. 726; Feb. 17, 1922, ch. 54, 42 Stat. 366; Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, §1, 43 Stat. 937; Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, §1, 45 Stat. 54).
Section consolidates part of section 344 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with sections 876 and 877 of said title. Other provisions of said section 344 are incorporated in sections 1257 and 2103 of this title.
Words "or a court of appeals" were inserted after "Supreme Court" upon authority of United States v. Illinois Surety Co., C.C.A. 1915, 226 F. 653, affirmed 37 S.Ct. 614, 244 U.S. 376, 61 L.Ed. 1206, wherein it was held that this section also applied to the courts of appeals in view of section 11 of the Circuit Court of Appeals Act of Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 517, 28 Stat. 829.
The revised section will cover instances where the Supreme Court remands a case to the highest court of a State and to the United States Tax Court. It will also cover a remand of a case to the Court of Claims or the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. For authority to remand a case to The Tax Court, see Equitable Life Assurance Society of U.S. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1944, 64 S.Ct. 722, 321 U.S. 560, 88 L.Ed. 927.
Revised section will also permit a remand by the Supreme Court to a court of appeals inasmuch as such latter court then would be a lower court. The revised section is in conformity with numerous holdings of the Supreme Court to the effect that such a remand may be made. See especially, Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States, 1929, 49 S.Ct. 484, 279 U.S. 792, 73 L.Ed. 960; Krauss Bros. Co. v. Mellon, 1928, 48 S.Ct. 358, 276 U.S. 386, 72 L.Ed. 620 and Buzyuski v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 1928, 48 S.Ct. 440, 277 U.S. 226, 72 L.Ed. 860.
The last sentence of section 876 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., providing that the Supreme Court should not issue execution but should send a special mandate to the inferior court to award execution, was omitted. See rule 34 of the revised rules of the Supreme Court relating to Mandates, and section 1651 of this title authorizing the Supreme Court to issue all writs necessary in aid of its jurisdiction.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§344, 876, 877 (R.S. §701; Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 517, §§10, 11, 26 Stat. 829; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§231, 236, 237, 291, 36 Stat. 1156, 1167; Dec. 23, 1914, ch. 2, 38 Stat. 790; Sept. 16, 1916, ch. 448, §2, 39 Stat. 726; Feb. 17, 1922, ch. 54, 42 Stat. 366; Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, §1, 43 Stat. 937; Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, §1, 45 Stat. 54).
Section consolidates part of section 344 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with sections 876 and 877 of said title. Other provisions of said section 344 are incorporated in sections 1257 and 2103 of this title.
Words "or a court of appeals" were inserted after "Supreme Court" upon authority of United States v. Illinois Surety Co., C.C.A. 1915, 226 F. 653, affirmed 37 S.Ct. 614, 244 U.S. 376, 61 L.Ed. 1206, wherein it was held that this section also applied to the courts of appeals in view of section 11 of the Circuit Court of Appeals Act of Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 517, 28 Stat. 829.
The revised section will cover instances where the Supreme Court remands a case to the highest court of a State and to the United States Tax Court. It will also cover a remand of a case to the Court of Claims or the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. For authority to remand a case to The Tax Court, see Equitable Life Assurance Society of U.S. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1944, 64 S.Ct. 722, 321 U.S. 560, 88 L.Ed. 927.
Revised section will also permit a remand by the Supreme Court to a court of appeals inasmuch as such latter court then would be a lower court. The revised section is in conformity with numerous holdings of the Supreme Court to the effect that such a remand may be made. See especially, Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States, 1929, 49 S.Ct. 484, 279 U.S. 792, 73 L.Ed. 960; Krauss Bros. Co. v. Mellon, 1928, 48 S.Ct. 358, 276 U.S. 386, 72 L.Ed. 620 and Buzyuski v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 1928, 48 S.Ct. 440, 277 U.S. 226, 72 L.Ed. 860.
The last sentence of section 876 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., providing that the Supreme Court should not issue execution but should send a special mandate to the inferior court to award execution, was omitted. See rule 34 of the revised rules of the Supreme Court relating to Mandates, and section 1651 of this title authorizing the Supreme Court to issue all writs necessary in aid of its jurisdiction.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2106.