FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 228
Counsel for financially unable defendants
18 U.S.C. § 3599
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter228 — DEATH SENTENCE
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 3599 (Counsel for financially unable defendants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 3599.
Text
(a)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, in every criminal action in which a defendant is charged with a crime which may be punishable by death, a defendant who is or becomes financially unable to obtain adequate representation or investigative, expert, or other reasonably necessary services at any time either—
(A)before judgment; or
(B)after the entry of a judgment imposing a sentence of death but before the execution of that judgment;
shall be entitled to the appointment of one or more attorneys and the furnishing of such other services in accordance with subsections (b) through (f).
(2)In any post conviction proceeding under section 2254 or 2255 of title 28, United States Code, seeking to vacate or set aside a death sentence, any defendant who is or becomes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Proceeding before the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia v. Johnson
790 F.3d 457 (Third Circuit, 2015)
Gore v. Crews
720 F.3d 811 (Eleventh Circuit, 2013)
Anastazia Schmid v. Steve McCauley
825 F.3d 348 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
Fautenberry v. Mitchell
572 F.3d 267 (Sixth Circuit, 2009)
In Re Carlyle
644 F.3d 694 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
Carlos Ayestas v. William Stephens, Director
817 F.3d 888 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
Carter v. Bradshaw
644 F.3d 329 (Sixth Circuit, 2011)
Commonwealth v. Pruitt
41 A.3d 1289 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Holiday v. Stephens
136 S. Ct. 387 (Supreme Court, 2015)
Matthews v. White
807 F.3d 756 (Sixth Circuit, 2015)
Michael Tisius v. David Vandergriff
55 F.4th 1153 (Eighth Circuit, 2022)
Lee v. Kelley
854 F.3d 544 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)
Michael v. Horn
476 F. App'x 277 (Third Circuit, 2011)
Williams v. Lawson
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
United States v. Mark Snarr
(Fifth Circuit, 2013)
Odraye Jones v. Margaret Bradshaw
(Sixth Circuit, 2022)
Rhines v. Weber
(D. South Dakota, 2018)
William Speer v. William Stephens, Director
(Fifth Circuit, 2015)
Harbison v. Bell
(Sixth Circuit, 2007)
Gobert v. Lumpkin
(Fifth Circuit, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 109–177, title II, §222(a), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 231; amended Pub. L. 110–406, §12(c), Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4294.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2008—Subsec. (g)(2). Pub. L. 110–406 inserted "or senior" after "active" in second sentence.
Amendments
2008—Subsec. (g)(2). Pub. L. 110–406 inserted "or senior" after "active" in second sentence.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 3599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/3599.