Mitchell v. State
216 S.W.3d 694, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 339, 2007 WL 581383
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 713 →
Opinion
ORDER
Edward Mitchell appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. State, 216 S.W.3d 694, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 339, 2007 WL 581383 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
216 S.W.3d 694 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.