Mitchell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mitchell v. State

223 S.W.3d 179, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 745, 2007 WL 1412528

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 713 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 15, 2007·No. ED 88534·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Theodore Mitchell appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Theodore Mitchell appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Mitchell v. State, 223 S.W.3d 179, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 745, 2007 WL 1412528 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

223 S.W.3d 179 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.