Mitchell v. State

280 S.W.3d 789, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 446, 2009 WL 987334
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 14, 2009·No. ED 91273·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carl Mitchell appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15. We find that the motion court did not err in denying Mitchell’s motion.

*790 An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment of the motion court under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. State, 280 S.W.3d 789, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 446, 2009 WL 987334 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

280 S.W.3d 789 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
280 S.W.3d 789 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)