Mitchell v. State
194 S.W.3d 387, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 921, 2006 WL 1737816
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 713 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant filed this appeal from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion which asserted trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise Movant he could waive a pre-sen-tence investigation and keep damaging information away from the sentencing judge. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. State, 194 S.W.3d 387, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 921, 2006 WL 1737816 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
194 S.W.3d 387 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.