Miller v. State
629 So. 2d 961, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13229, 1993 WL 533863
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 1993·No. No. 92-01507·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
On this second appeal, we affirm Gus Miller’s sentences in all respects except the habitual offender designation for his misdemeanor convictions. Habitual offender treatment is not allowed for misdemeanors. Teasley v. State, 610 So.2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), review denied, 618 So.2d 1370 (Fla.1993). Therefore, we remand only for the trial court to delete the habitual offender designation on the two misdemeanor sentences.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 629 So. 2d 961, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13229, 1993 WL 533863 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
629 So. 2d 961 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hobley v. State
779 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)