Miller v. State
588 So. 2d 607, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9089, 1991 WL 170836
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 573 So. 2d 405 →
Opinion
Appellant challenges his conviction and sentence for two counts of delivery of cannabis. We find no merit in the points he raises in the appeal. We affirm his conviction and sentence.
We do, however, find that the judgment erroneously lists appellant’s convictions as second degree felonies. As provided in section 893.13(l)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (1989), appellant is guilty of felonies in the third degree. We remand for correction of the judgment to so reflect, but otherwise affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 588 So. 2d 607, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9089, 1991 WL 170836 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
588 So. 2d 607 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.