Miller v. State
567 So. 2d 1041, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983, 1990 WL 154779
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 1990·No. No. 90-1190·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
AFFIRMED. Huff v. State, 566 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1990); Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315. We certify the [1042]*1042following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:
DOES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES FOR SECTION 921.087, FLORIDA STATUTES?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 567 So. 2d 1041, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983, 1990 WL 154779 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
567 So. 2d 1041 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cunningham v. State
570 So. 2d 1147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Denhart v. Dugger
567 So. 2d 1041 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)