Cunningham v. State
570 So. 2d 1147, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9455, 1990 WL 205445
Opinion
AFFIRMED. As in Glass v. State, 556 So.2d 465 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), Betsey v. State, 558 So.2d 202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), Buckley v. State, 558 So.2d 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), and Miller v. State, 567 So.2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), we certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:
DOES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES OF [1148] SECTION 921.187, FLORIDA STATUTES?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cunningham v. State, 570 So. 2d 1147, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9455, 1990 WL 205445 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
570 So. 2d 1147 (Cunningham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Glass v. State
556 So. 2d 465 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Buckley v. State
558 So. 2d 534 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Betsey v. State
558 So. 2d 202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Miller v. State
567 So. 2d 1041 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)