Miller v. State

583 So. 2d 820, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8399, 1991 WL 158574
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 573 So. 2d 405
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 21, 1991·No. No. 90-1564·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing additional special conditions to his probation other than those recited in the written plea agreement and discussed at the sentencing hearing. We note that appellant, acting pro se, filed a written objection to the addition of these provisions after appellant received the written order containing the additional special conditions.

We remand with directions that the additional special conditions be stricken.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., ANSTEAD, J., and OFTEDAL, RICHARD L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 583 So. 2d 820, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8399, 1991 WL 158574 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

583 So. 2d 820 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.