Miller v. State

601 So. 2d 604, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6861, 1992 WL 131791
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 17, 1992·No. No. 92-1216·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court summarily denied the motion as untimely. Appellant’s judgment and sentence were not final for purposes of rule 3.850 until this court issued its mandate in the direct appeal on October 12, 1990. See Huff v. State, 569 So.2d 1247, 1250 (Fla.1990); Ferris v. State, 575 So.2d 303 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Therefore, we find that appellant’s November 19, 1991, motion was timely filed within the two year period provided by rule 3.850. Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, WARNER and POLEN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 601 So. 2d 604, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6861, 1992 WL 131791 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

601 So. 2d 604 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
630 So. 2d 225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
In Interest of JM
601 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)