McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution
404 U.S. 1057
This text of 404 U.S. 1057 (McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution, 404 U.S. 1057 (1972).
Opinion
Ct. Sp. App. Md. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 999.] Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that E. Barrett' Prettyman, Jr., Esquire, of Washington, D. C., a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
404 U.S. 1057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneil-v-director-patuxent-institution-scotus-1972.