McLeod v. Garrish

72 So. 72, 196 Ala. 389, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 460
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 18, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 72 So. 72 (McLeod v. Garrish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McLeod v. Garrish, 72 So. 72, 196 Ala. 389, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 460 (Ala. 1916).

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

(1, 2) No bill of exceptions was signed by the presiding judge, or established as provided by the statute. Rulings on the trial, required to be presented by bill of exceptions, cannot be considered by this court unless so presented. The written agreement of counsel in this cause is not a bill of excep[391]*391tions. Such agreement, on proper motion in the appellate court, would have been sufficient evidence to establish the bill of exceptions.—Graves, et al. v. State, 178 Ala. 1, 59 South. 584; Cook v. Phonoharp Co., 168 Ala. 517, 50 South. 1021.

(3) The transcript fails to show a legal judgment as the basis for the appeal sought to be taken, and dismissal of the appeal must follow on this ground.—Gunter v. Mason, 125 Ala. 644, 27 South. 843; C. of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Coursen, 8 Ala. App. 589, 62 South. 977.

(4) The judgment appealed from can be presented to the appellate court only by certified transcript of the record of the trial court, and the bill of exceptions cannot be looked to for the judgment.—Conway v. Clark, et al., 171 Ala. 391, 55 South. 117; Borom, et al. v. Posey, et al., 133 Ala. 666, 31 South. 1035; Street v. Frank, 136 Ala. 616, 33 South. 879; Gaston v. Marengo Imp. Co., 139 Ala. 465, 36 South. 738; Lay v. Postal Tel. Co., 171 Ala. 172, 54 South. 529.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed..

Anderson, C. J., and Mayfield and Somerville, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gunter v. Mason
125 Ala. 644 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1899)
Borom v. Posey
133 Ala. 666 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1901)
Street v. Frank
136 Ala. 616 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1902)
Gaston v. Marengo Improvement Co.
139 Ala. 465 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1903)
Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Coursen
62 So. 977 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
Cook v. Phonoharp Co.
50 So. 1021 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)
Lyons v. Bradley
53 So. 244 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)
Lay v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.
54 So. 529 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Conway v. Clark
55 So. 117 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Graves v. State
59 So. 584 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 So. 72, 196 Ala. 389, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcleod-v-garrish-ala-1916.