Cook v. Phonoharp Co.

50 So. 1021, 163 Ala. 517, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 559
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 16, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 So. 1021 (Cook v. Phonoharp Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cook v. Phonoharp Co., 50 So. 1021, 163 Ala. 517, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 559 (Ala. 1909).

Opinion

MAYFIELD, J.

The only judgment shown by the transcript in this case is that appearing as a part of what purports to be, and is called, the bill of exceptions. But this is not a bill of exceptions, because it is not signed by the trial judge, does not purport to be signed by any one, and is not in any other manner sufficiently authenticated to be known or considered by this court as a bill of exceptions. In view of this condition of the record, there is nothing for us to review.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dowdell, O. J., and Anderson and Sayre, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLeod v. Garrish
72 So. 72 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 So. 1021, 163 Ala. 517, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-phonoharp-co-ala-1909.