Conway v. Clark
55 So. 117, 171 Ala. 391, 1911 Ala. LEXIS 112
Opinion
In this case no judgment appears in the record proper, and according to repeated decisions of this court the recital of the judgment in the bill of exceptions cannot be considered. — Sivoly v. Scott et al., 56 Ala. 555, 557; Wright v. State, 136 Ala. 139, 145, 34 South. 233; Street et al. v. Frank, 136 Ala. 616, 33 South. 879; Thayer v. State, 138 Ala. 39, 48, 35 South. 406.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Conway v. Clark, 55 So. 117, 171 Ala. 391, 1911 Ala. LEXIS 112 (Ala. 1911).
55 So. 117 (Conway v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Capital Security Co. v. Owen
72 So. 8 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
McLeod v. Garrish
72 So. 72 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
Wise v. State
66 So. 128 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1914)
Irby v. Kaigler
60 So. 418 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)