Street v. Frank

136 Ala. 616
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 136 Ala. 616 (Street v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Street v. Frank, 136 Ala. 616 (Ala. 1902).

Opinion

DOWDELL, J.

It is a settled rule of this court, that judgments appealed from, must appear in the transcript as a part of the record of the court below, and cannot be shown by bill of exceptions merely. In this case, it appears in the record proper as certified by the clerk, and to which part alone we can look for the judgment of the court appealed from. that, on June 5th, 1900, there was a judgment of dismissal of the certiorari, and subsequently on June 19th, 1900. there was another order or judgment of the court, setting aside the former judgment, These are the only judgments shown by the record proper. From this it appears that the cause stands in the court below undisposed of. There being no judgment from which to appeal, it necessarily follows that the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLeod v. Garrish
72 So. 72 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
Irby v. Kaigler
60 So. 418 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)
Conway v. Clark
55 So. 117 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 Ala. 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/street-v-frank-ala-1902.