McFadden v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McFadden v. State

775 So. 2d 965, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 906, 2000 WL 121793

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 2, 2000

DocketNo. 4D98-3553

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 775 So. 2d 965 (McFadden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McFadden v. State, 775 So. 2d 965, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 906, 2000 WL 121793 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for aggravated battery. We reverse appellant’s sentence under both the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act (PRRA) and the Habitual Felony Offender Act (HFOA). The trial court sentenced appellant to thirty years with a ten-year mandatory minimum sentence as a habitual violent felony offender and to a fifteen-year mandatory minimum sentence under the PRRA. For the reasons discussed in Adams v. State, 750 So.2d 659 at 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), the sentences imposed constituted multiple punishment for the same offense and violated double jeopardy. We remand for the trial court to vacate appellant’s sentence and resentenee him pursuant to either the PRRA or the HFOA. See §§ 775.084, 775.082, Fla. Stat. (1999).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, REMANDED.

DELL, STONE and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for aggravated battery. We reverse appellant’s sentence under both the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act (PRRA) and the Habitual Felony Offender Act (HFOA). The trial court sentenced appellant to thirty years with a ten-year mandatory minimum sentence as a habitual violent felony offender and to a fifteen-year mandatory minimum sentence under the PRRA. For the reasons discussed in Adams v. State, 750 So.2d 659 at 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), the sentences imposed constituted multiple punishment for the same offense and violated double jeopardy. We remand for the trial court to vacate appellant’s sentence and resentenee him pursuant to either the PRRA or the HFOA. See §§ 775.084, 775.082, Fla. Stat. (1999).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, REMANDED.

DELL, STONE and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

775 So. 2d 965, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 906, 2000 WL 121793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfadden-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack