Orr v. State

776 So. 2d 986, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 119, 2001 WL 20754
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 10, 2001
DocketNo. 4D00-3844
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 776 So. 2d 986 (Orr v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orr v. State, 776 So. 2d 986, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 119, 2001 WL 20754 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm as untimely that part of the appeal which seeks review of appellant’s 1995 conviction. To the extent Orr is appealing the denial of his trial court motion (whether it be a 3.800 or 3.850 motion) directed to his 1999 revocation of probation and resulting sentences, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice. Orr already has pending in this court direct appeals of those revocations in case numbers 4D99-4339, 4D99-4340, and 4D99-4341. See Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) and 3.800 and Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h), 9.14-0, and 9.600, 761 So.2d 1015 (Fla.1999).

DELL, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salczman v. Joquiel
776 So. 2d 986 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
776 So. 2d 986, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 119, 2001 WL 20754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orr-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.