Brown v. State
793 So. 2d 27, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4098, 2001 WL 303230
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 30, 2001·No. No. 2D00-5089·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
Andrew Brown timely appeals the summary denial of his motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm. As to Brown’s second claim, seeking credit for the time between sentencing and his commitment to prison, this claim must be pursued administratively with the Department of Corrections. See Street v. State, 693 So.2d 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. State, 793 So. 2d 27, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4098, 2001 WL 303230 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
793 So. 2d 27 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
JOSEPH TANKER TILLMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
TIFFINY ROUSEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
WILLIAM C. ROUTENBERG v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Routenberg v. State
242 So. 3d 1056 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Newman v. State
246 So. 3d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Haithcock v. State
210 So. 3d 185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Smith v. State
198 So. 3d 1048 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Landis v. State
145 So. 3d 935 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Miller v. State
790 So. 2d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)