WILLIAM C. ROUTENBERG v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 2018·No. 17-3907·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIAM C. ROUTENBERG, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3907 )

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed February 21, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Joseph Bulone, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(b); Stovall v. Cooper, 860 So. 2d 5

(Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en banc); Stokes v. State, 851 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003);

Brown v. State, 793 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Brito v. State, 194 So. 3d 522 (Fla.

3d DCA 2016).

KHOUZAM, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILLIAM C. ROUTENBERG v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

WILLIAM C. ROUTENBERG v. STATE OF FLORIDA (WILLIAM C. ROUTENBERG v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stovall v. Cooper
860 So. 2d 5 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Brito v. State
194 So. 3d 522 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Brown v. State
793 So. 2d 27 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Stokes v. State
851 So. 2d 788 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)