Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Routenberg v. State

Routenberg v. State

242 So. 3d 1056
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 2018
DocketCase No. 2D17–3907
StatusPublished

This text of 242 So. 3d 1056 (Routenberg v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Routenberg v. State, 242 So. 3d 1056 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(b) ; Stovall v. Cooper, 860 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en banc); Stokes v. State, 851 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ; Brown v. State, 793 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) ; Brito v. State, 194 So. 3d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

KHOUZAM, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stovall v. Cooper
860 So. 2d 5 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Brito v. State
194 So. 3d 522 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Brown v. State
793 So. 2d 27 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Stokes v. State
851 So. 2d 788 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 So. 3d 1056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/routenberg-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.