McDermott v. Hayes

60 N.H. 9
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1880·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

The defendant may apply to the probate court forthwith for a modification of the decree on due notice. Warner Bank v. Clement, 58 N. H. 533; Ayer v. Messer, 59 N. H. 279, 280. When the decree shows payment of the plaintiff’s share, judgment' *10 will be rendered on tbe verdict. Roulo v. Valcour, 58 N. H. 347; Morrill v. Hovey, 59 N. H. 107; Boudreau v. Eastman, 59 N. H. 467.

Qase discharged.

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDermott v. Hayes, 60 N.H. 9 (N.H. 1880).

60 N.H. 9 (McDermott v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arsenault v. Scanlon
660 A.2d 1110 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1995)
Raymond v. Goodrich
116 A. 38 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1921)