Warner Bank v. Clement & Co.
This text of 58 N.H. 533 (Warner Bank v. Clement & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no doubt of the power of the court in any case, for sufficient cause, to bring forward an action and vacate the judgment rendered therein. Bellows v. Stone, 14 N. H. 175; Frink v. Frink, 43 N. H. 508; Hillsborough v. Nichols, 46 N. H. 379; Judge of Probate v. Webster, 46 N. H. 518; Stickney v. Davis, 17 Pick. 170; McClew v. Burt, 5 Met. 200.
What is sufficient cause is a question of fact, depending upon the particular circumstances of each case. These should be established by evidence at the trial term.
Case discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 N.H. 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warner-bank-v-clement-co-nh-1879.