Melvin v. Melvin

58 A. 835, 73 N.H. 602, 1904 N.H. LEXIS 28

Opinion

Parsons, C. J.

Whether sufficient cause appears in any ease to require that an action should be brought forward and the judgment vacated, is a question of fact.

The evidentiary facts stated are not necessarily inconsistent with a finding that justice did not require such action in this case; consequently the dismissal of the motion presents no error of law. Fulton Pulley Co. v. Company, 71 N. H. 384; Reed v. Prescott, 70 N. H. 88; Clough v. Moore, 63 N. H. 111, 113; Warner Bank v. Clement, 58 N. H. 533.

Exception overruled.

Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.