Morrill v. Hovey
This text of 59 N.H. 107 (Morrill v. Hovey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no occasion for a new trial. The facts are found, and the proper judgment will be rendered in due time. /The mortgage debt is due; the plaintiff agreed to pay it; and he should not have judgment before he performs his agreement. When he performs it, he will be entitled to his actual damages. „The rights of both parties will be protected at the trial term. Roberts v. Peavey, 27 N. H. 477, 502; Stone v. Clough, 41 N. H. 290, 300; Heywood v. Hartshorn, 55 N. H. 476, 483; Hobbs v. Hobbs, 58 N. H. 81; Moore v. Kidder, 58 N. H. 115, 116; Taft v. Barrett, 58 N. H. 447, 458; Marston v. Stiekney, 58 N. H. 609, 611; Martin v. E. F. Ins. Co., 9 Vroom 140.
Case discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 N.H. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrill-v-hovey-nh-1879.