Morrill v. Hovey

59 N.H. 107
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1879·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

There is no occasion for a new trial. The facts are found, and the proper judgment will be rendered in due time. /The mortgage debt is due; the plaintiff agreed to pay it; and he should not have judgment before he performs his agreement. When he performs it, he will be entitled to his actual damages. „The rights of both parties will be protected at the trial term. Roberts v. Peavey, 27 N. H. 477, 502; Stone v. Clough, 41 N. H. 290, 300; Heywood v. Hartshorn, 55 N. H. 476, 483; Hobbs v. Hobbs, 58 N. H. 81; Moore v. Kidder, 58 N. H. 115, 116; Taft v. Barrett, 58 N. H. 447, 458; Marston v. Stiekney, 58 N. H. 609, 611; Martin v. E. F. Ins. Co., 9 Vroom 140.

Case discharged.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morrill v. Hovey, 59 N.H. 107 (N.H. 1879).

59 N.H. 107 (Morrill v. Hovey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owen v. Weston
4 A. 801 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1885)
Fletcher v. Chamberlin
61 N.H. 438 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1881)
Nelson v. Hall
60 N.H. 274 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1880)
Cain v. Dickenson
60 N.H. 371 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1880)
McDermott v. Hayes
60 N.H. 9 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1880)