Morrill v. Hovey
Opinion
There is no occasion for a new trial. The facts are found, and the proper judgment will be rendered in due time. /The mortgage debt is due; the plaintiff agreed to pay it; and he should not have judgment before he performs his agreement. When he performs it, he will be entitled to his actual damages. „The rights of both parties will be protected at the trial term. Roberts v. Peavey, 27 N. H. 477, 502; Stone v. Clough, 41 N. H. 290, 300; Heywood v. Hartshorn, 55 N. H. 476, 483; Hobbs v. Hobbs, 58 N. H. 81; Moore v. Kidder, 58 N. H. 115, 116; Taft v. Barrett, 58 N. H. 447, 458; Marston v. Stiekney, 58 N. H. 609, 611; Martin v. E. F. Ins. Co., 9 Vroom 140.
Case discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
59 N.H. 107 (Morrill v. Hovey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.