Boudreau v. Eastman
Opinion
It does not appear to be material whether the plaintiff, or his brother, the undisclosed principal and plaintiff in interest, is plaintiff'of record. The writ may be amended by substituting the brother for the plaintiff (Judge of Probate v. Jackson, 58 N. H. 458), or by an entry that the brother appears and prosecutes the action as plaintiff in interest. Folsom v. O. F. Ins. Co., 59 N. H. 54. As neither the course nor the result of the trial would have been affected by such an amendment if it had been made before the trial, it may be made now without a new trial. Roulo v. Valcour, 58 N. H. 347. Let the record show the truth. When the amendment is made, there will be
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
59 N.H. 467 (Boudreau v. Eastman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.