Hazen v. Quimby

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Hazen v. Quimby

61 N.H. 76

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 5, 1881

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 61 N.H. 76 (Hazen v. Quimby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hazen v. Quimby, 61 N.H. 76 (N.H. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

Justice may require the amendment. Judge of Probate v. Jackson, 58 N. H. 458; Folsom v. Insurance Co., 59 N. H. 54; Prescott v. Farmer, 59 N. H. 90; Buckminster v. Wright, 59 N. H. 153; Boudreau v. Eastman, 59 N. H. 467; Chauncy v. Insurance Co., 60 N. H. 428. The case presents no question of law.

Exception overruled.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe, C. J.

Justice may require the amendment. Judge of Probate v. Jackson, 58 N. H. 458; Folsom v. Insurance Co., 59 N. H. 54; Prescott v. Farmer, 59 N. H. 90; Buckminster v. Wright, 59 N. H. 153; Boudreau v. Eastman, 59 N. H. 467; Chauncy v. Insurance Co., 60 N. H. 428. The case presents no question of law.

Exception overruled.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 N.H. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hazen-v-quimby-nh-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack