Mayer v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
This text of Mayer v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs (Mayer v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
TIMOTHY PATRICK MAYER, Case No. 2:22-cv-11442 Plaintiff, HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III v.
US DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Defendant. /
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE Plaintiff Timothy Patrick Mayer sued the United States Department of Veterans Affairs under the Federal Tort Claims Act. ECF 1. Plaintiff is a Lake County, Indiana resident. Id. at 2. And the allegedly tortious conduct occurred while the “Veteran’s [sic] Administration [sic] transported him from Chicago to his home in Indiana.” Id. “Any civil action on a tort claim against the United States . . . may be prosecuted only in the judicial district where the plaintiff resides or wherein the act or omission complained of occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1402(b). When venue is improper, the Court may, in the interest of justice, transfer the case to a district where it could have been brought. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). To that end, the Court may sua sponte transfer a case based on improper venue. Carver v. Knox Cnty., Tenn., 887 F.2d 1287, 1291 (6th Cir. 1989). Here, Plaintiff resides in Lake County, Indiana, ECF 1, PgID 2, which is in the Northern District of Indiana, 28 U.S.C. § 94(a)(3). Because the tortious conduct occurred while Plaintiff was being transported from Chicago to Lake County, it is almost certain that the allegedly tortious acts occurred somewhere between the two places. See ECF 1, PgID 2–3. Thus, the allegedly tortious acts took place either in the
Northern District of Indiana or the Northern District of Illinois, 28 U.S.C. § 93(a). Put differently, venue is improper in the Eastern District of Michigan. The Court will therefore sua sponte transfer the case to the Northern District of Indiana where venue is proper. WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court must TRANSFER the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).
SO ORDERED.
s/ Stephen J. Murphy, III STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III United States District Judge Dated: June 28, 2022
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on June 28, 2022, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/ David P. Parker Case Manager
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mayer v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayer-v-united-states-department-of-veterans-affairs-innd-2022.