FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 87

United States as defendant

28 U.S.C. § 1402
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter87 — DISTRICT COURTS; VENUE

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1402 (United States as defendant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1402.

Text

(a)Any civil action in a district court against the United States under subsection (a) of section 1346 of this title may be prosecuted only:
(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), in the judicial district where the plaintiff resides;
(2)In the case of a civil action by a corporation under paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of section 1346, in the judicial district in which is located the principal place of business or principal office or agency of the corporation; or if it has no principal place of business or principal office or agency in any judicial district (A) in the judicial district in which is located the office to which was made the return of the tax in respect of which the claim is made, or (B) if no return was made, in the judicial district in which lies the District of Columbi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richards v. United States
369 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1962)
1,602 case citations
Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School Lands
461 U.S. 273 (Supreme Court, 1983)
1,002 case citations
California v. Arizona
440 U.S. 59 (Supreme Court, 1979)
66 case citations
Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United States
632 F.2d 278 (Fourth Circuit, 1980)
36 case citations
Bywaters v. United States
196 F.R.D. 458 (E.D. Texas, 2000)
19 case citations
Dale v. United States
846 F. Supp. 2d 1256 (M.D. Florida, 2012)
6 case citations
Johnson v. United States
208 F.R.D. 148 (W.D. Texas, 2001)
6 case citations
Farrell v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.
295 F. Supp. 228 (S.D. New York, 1968)
5 case citations
Lopez v. Postal Regulatory Commission
709 F. App'x 13 (D.C. Circuit, 2017)
3 case citations
Appoloni v. United States
219 F.R.D. 116 (W.D. Michigan, 2003)
3 case citations
Klender v. United States
218 F.R.D. 551 (E.D. Michigan, 2003)
2 case citations
East v. United States
629 F. Supp. 682 (E.D. Missouri, 1986)
2 case citations
Jessie v. Robertson v. United States
294 F.2d 920 (D.C. Circuit, 1961)
2 case citations
Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. United States
305 F. Supp. 1020 (S.D. Texas, 1969)
2 case citations
Connors v. United States
720 F. Supp. 1258 (N.D. Texas, 1989)
1 case citations
Cooper v. United States
897 F. Supp. 306 (E.D. Texas, 1995)
1 case citations
Boruski v. U. S. Government
70 F.R.D. 553 (D. Massachusetts, 1976)
1 case citations
Standard Lime & Cement Co. v. United States
503 F. Supp. 938 (W.D. Michigan, 1980)
1 case citations
Thibodeau v. Pierce
683 F. Supp. 15 (D. Rhode Island, 1988)
1 case citations
Hendricks v. Solomon
474 F. Supp. 280 (E.D. Missouri, 1979)
1 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 937; Pub. L. 85–920, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1770; Pub. L. 89–719, title II, §202(b), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1149; Pub. L. 92–562, §2, Oct. 25, 1972, 86 Stat. 1176; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §131, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 39.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§762, 931(a) (Mar. 3, 1887, ch. 359, §5, 24 Stat. 506; Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, §410(a), 60 Stat. 843).
Section consolidates the venue provisions of section 762 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with the venue provisions of section 931(a) of such title, the latter provisions relating to tort claims cases. The jurisdictional provisions of such section 931(a) are incorporated in section 1346(b) of this title. For other provisions thereof, see Distribution Table.
Provisions of section 762 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to the verification and contents of a petition filed against the United States were omitted as unnecessary. Section 265 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relative to the petition in cases filed in the Court of Claims was also omitted from the revised title. (See, also, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.)
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suit" in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–164 inserted "in a district court" after "civil action" in introductory provisions preceding par. (1). The phrase "civil action" also appeared in par. (2), but no change was made to reflect the probable intent of Congress as indicated on page 79 of House Report No. 97–312.
1972—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 92–562 added subsec. (d).
1966—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 89–719 added subsec. (c).
1958—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85–920 provided for venue and change of venue in tax refund suits by corporation.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

Effective Date of 1966 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 89–719 applicable after Nov. 2, 1966, see section 203 of Pub. L. 89–719, set out as a note under section 1346 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1402.