FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 5

Indiana

28 U.S.C. § 94

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 94 (Indiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 94.

Text

Indiana is divided into two judicial districts to be known as the Northern and Southern Districts of Indiana.

(a)The Northern District comprises three divisions.
(1)The Fort Wayne Division comprises the counties of Adams, Allen, Blackford, De Kalb, Grant, Huntington, Jay, Lagrange, Noble, Steuben, Wells, and Whitley. Court for the Fort Wayne Division shall be held at Fort Wayne.
(2)The South Bend Division comprises the counties of Cass, Elkhart, Fulton, Kosciusko, La Porte, Marshall, Miami, Pulaski, St. Joseph, Starke, and Wabash. Court for the South Bend Division shall be held at South Bend.
(3)The Hammond Division comprises the counties of Benton, Carroll, Jasper, Lake, Newton, Porter, Tippecanoe, Warren, and White. Court for the Hammond Division shall be held at Hammond and Lafayett

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haber v. Biomet, Inc.
578 F.3d 553 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)
54 case citations
Thomasson v. AmSouth Bank, N.A.
59 B.R. 997 (N.D. Alabama, 1986)
40 case citations
United States v. Metro M. Holovachka
314 F.2d 345 (Seventh Circuit, 1963)
38 case citations
Jeffers v. United States
451 F. Supp. 1338 (N.D. Indiana, 1978)
14 case citations
Books v. City of Elkhart, Ind.
79 F. Supp. 2d 979 (N.D. Indiana, 1999)
5 case citations
Berger Ex Rel. Berger v. Rensselaer Central School Corp.
766 F. Supp. 696 (N.D. Indiana, 1991)
4 case citations
Active Products Corp. v. A.H. Choitz & Co.
163 F.R.D. 274 (N.D. Indiana, 1995)
3 case citations
Hernandez v. I.C.E.
165 F. Supp. 3d 715 (N.D. Illinois, 2016)
2 case citations
Restricted Filer v. Roseboom
(N.D. Indiana, 2019)
Ojo v. WE Pebble Point, LLC
(S.D. New York, 2023)
United States v. Arroyo
310 F. App'x 928 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)
SEIN v. AMAZON
(S.D. Indiana, 2025)
DeJoy v. One America
(S.D. New York, 2022)

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 878; Feb. 10, 1954, ch. 6, §2(b)(7), 68 Stat. 11; Pub. L. 91–272, §9, June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 298.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §153 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §80, 36 Stat. 1110; Apr. 21, 1928, ch. 393, 45 Stat. 437).
Words "when the time fixed as above for the sitting of a court shall fall on a legal holiday the terms shall begin on the next day following," were omitted as within the discretion of the court and coverable by rule of court.
A provision that terms should not be limited to any particular number of days, and that a term about to commence in another division might be adjourned until the business of the court in session was concluded, was omitted as covered by section 140 of this title.
A provision authorizing indictments for offenses committed in divisions other than that wherein a grand jury is sitting was omitted as covered by Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rules 6, 7.
Provisions as to maintenance of clerks' offices were omitted as covered by sections 452 and 751 of this title.
The following provisions were omitted as either executed or covered by section 501 [now 541] et seq. and section 541 [now 561] et seq. of this title, containing similar provisions as to United States attorneys and marshals:
"A. The senior district judge for the district of Indiana in office immediately prior to April 21, 1928, shall be the district judge for the southern district as constituted by this section; the junior district judge for the district of Indiana immediately prior to April 21, 1928, shall be the district judge for the northern district as constituted by this section; and the district attorney and marshal for the district of Indiana in office immediately prior to April 21, 1928, shall be during the remainder of their present terms of office the district attorney and marshal for the southern district as constituted by this section.
"B. The President is authorized and directed to appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, a district attorney and a marshal for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana."
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1970—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 91–272 provided for holding court at Richmond.
1954—Subsec. (a)(3). Act Feb. 10, 1954, provided for holding court at Lafayette.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/94.