FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 87

Cure or waiver of defects

28 U.S.C. § 1406
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter87 — DISTRICT COURTS; VENUE

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1406 (Cure or waiver of defects) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1406.

Text

(a)The district court of a district in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.
(b)Nothing in this chapter shall impair the jurisdiction of a district court of any matter involving a party who does not interpose timely and sufficient objection to the venue.
(c)As used in this section, the term "district court" includes the District Court of Guam, the District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, and the District Court of the Virgin Islands, and the term "district" includes the territorial jurisdiction of each such court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. United States
629 F.2d 581 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
17 case citations
Bartel v. Various
965 F. Supp. 2d 612 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2013)
14 case citations
Donald L. Atkins v. Schmutz Manufacturing Company, Incorporated
401 F.2d 731 (Fourth Circuit, 1968)
9 case citations
Caldera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Los Alamos National Security, LLC
844 F. Supp. 2d 926 (N.D. Illinois, 2012)
7 case citations
Breland v. ATC Vancom, Inc.
212 F.R.D. 475 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2002)
6 case citations
3573522 Canada Inc. v. North Country Natural Spring Water, Ltd.
210 F.R.D. 544 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2002)
1 case citations
Young Properties Corporation v. United Equity Corporation
534 F.2d 847 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
1 case citations
Webster v. Potter
185 F. Supp. 3d 74 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Love v. Tytus
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Protingent Inc v. Gustafson-Feis
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Zhang v. Dehart
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Rojas v. Garland
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Chang v. Tropicana Casino
(S.D. New York, 2021)
Person v. Jones
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Provencio v. Gifford
(E.D. Arkansas, 2019)

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 937; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §81, 63 Stat. 101; Pub. L. 86–770, §1, Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 912; Pub. L. 87–845, §10, Oct. 18, 1962, 76A Stat. 699; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §132, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 39; Pub. L. 104–317, title VI, §610(b), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3860.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes

1948 Act
Subsection (a) provides statutory sanction for transfer instead of dismissal, where venue is improperly laid.
Subsection (b) is declaratory of existing law. (See Panama R.R. Co. v. Johnson, 1924, 44 S.Ct. 391, 264 U.S. 375, 68 L.Ed. 748.) It makes clear the intent of Congress that venue provisions are not jurisdictional but may be waived.

1949 Act
This section removes an ambiguity in section 1406(a) of title 28, U.S.C., by substituting "may" for "shall", thus making it clear that the court may decline to transfer a case brought in the wrong district under circumstances where it would not be in the interest of justice to make such transfer. [The amendment to section 1406(a) of this title described in this note was altered in the bill as enacted. See Cong. Rec., vol. 95, pt. 5, pp. 5826, 5827, 6283, 6284.]

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1996—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–317 amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (c) read as follows: "As used in this section, 'district court' includes the United States District Court for the District of the Canal Zone; and 'district' includes the territorial jurisdiction of that court."
1982—Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 97–164 redesignated subsec. (d) as (c). Former subsec. (c), which provided that if a case within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Claims were filed in a district court, the district court, if it were in the interest of justice, was required to transfer the case to the Court of Claims where the case would proceed as if it had been filed in the Court of Claims on the date that it was filed in the district court, was struck out.
1962—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 87–845 added subsec. (d).
1960—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 86–770 added subsec. (c).
1949—Subsec. (a). Act May 24, 1949, inserted "dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–317 applicable to cases pending on Oct. 19, 1996, and to cases commenced on or after such date, see section 610(c) of Pub. L. 104–317, set out as a note under section 1404 of this title.

Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

Effective Date of 1962 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 87–845 effective Jan. 2, 1962, see section 25 of Pub. L. 87–845, set out as a note under section 414 of this title.

Effective Date of 1960 Amendment
Pub. L. 86–770, §4, Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 913, provided in part that: "The amendments made by sections 1 and 2 of this Act [adding subsec. (c) of this section and section 1506 of this title] shall apply to any case or proceeding pending on, or brought after, the date of enactment of this Act [Sept. 13, 1960] in the district courts or the Court of Claims."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1406.