Zhang v. Dehart

• Court: District Court, W.D. Washington
• Decided: April 9, 2024
• Docket: 2:24-cv-00064
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE

9 QINGLI ZHANG, Case No. 2:24-cv-00064-KKE 10 Plaintiff, STIPULATED MOTION TO HOLD 11 CASE IN ABEYANCE AND ORDER v. 12 Noted for Consideration on: JIM DEHART, et al., April 8, 2024 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their counsel of record, pursuant to Federal 16 Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules 7(d)(1), 10(g) and 16, hereby jointly stipulate and 17 move to stay discovery, including the Court’s Order setting Initial Scheduling Dates (Dkt. No. 18 7) until after this Court decides Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 8). Plaintiff brings 19 this litigation pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act and Mandamus Act seeking, inter 20 alia, to compel Defendants to complete processing his non-immigrant visa application. 21 Defendants’ motion is noted for April 19, 2024. For good cause, the parties request that the 22 Court stay discovery until after this motion is decided. 23 This Court has wide discretion to stay discovery while a motion to dismiss is pending. 24 Rae v. Union Bank, 725 F.2d 478, 481 (9th Cir. 1984); Jarvis v. Regan, 833 F.2d 149, 155 (9th 1 Cir. 1987). A court may relieve a party of the burdens of discovery while a motion is pending 2 pursuant to its inherent authority over discovery matters and pursuant to the Federal Rules of 3 Civil Procedure. Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (a court may deny or limit discovery upon a showing

4 of good cause). Stays are appropriate where it “furthers the goal of efficiency for the court and 5 litigants.” Little v. City of Seattle, 863 F.2d 681, 685 (9th Cir. 1988); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 6 (Federal Rules should be “construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to 7 secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding.”). 8 Because the motion to dismiss, if granted, would be fully dispositive of this case, a stay 9 of discovery would save both time and resources, as well as potential judicial resources 10 regarding discovery disputes. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that discovery be 11 stayed and the initial scheduling deadlines (Dkt. No. 7) be vacated. If Defendants’ motion to 12 dismiss is denied, the parties will submit a joint status report within 14 days. 13 //

14 // 15 // 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 //

23 // 24 // 1 DATED this 8th day of April, 2024. 2 Respectfully submitted,

3 TESSA M. GORMAN GOLDST EI N IMMIGR ATION LAWYERS United States Attorney 4 s/Michelle R. Lambert s/Joshua L. Goldstein 5 MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 JOSHUA L. GOLDSTEIN, WSBA# 61773 Assistant United States Attorney 611 Wilshire Boulevard, Ste. 317 6 United States Attorney’s Office Los Angeles, California 90017 Western District of Washington Phone: (213) 425-1979 7 1201 Pacific Avenue, Suite 700 Email: jg@jgoldlaw.com Tacoma, Washington 98402 8 Phone: (253) 428-3824 Email: michelle.lambert@usdoj.gov 9 Attorneys for Defendants Attorney for Plaintiff 10 I certify that this memorandum contains 326 11 words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules. 12

24 1 ORDER 2 Discovery is stayed pending a decision on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 8). 3 The deadlines in the Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Chambers Procedures, Joint Status

4 Report, and Early Settlement (Dkt. No. 7) are VACATED. If the Motion to Dismiss is denied, 5 the parties shall submit a joint status report within 14 days of the order. It is so ORDERED. 6 Dated this 9th day of April, 2024. 7 A 8 Kymberly K. Evanson United States District Judge 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24