Matter of Interest on Trust Accounts

396 So. 2d 719
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 30, 1981
Docket51182, 60350 and 60351
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 396 So. 2d 719 (Matter of Interest on Trust Accounts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Interest on Trust Accounts, 396 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 1981).

Opinion

396 So.2d 719 (1981)

IN the matter of INTEREST ON TRUST ACCOUNTS.
Petition of THE FLORIDA BAR FOUNDATION, INC.

Nos. 51182, 60350 and 60351.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 30, 1981.

Russell Carlisle, President, Florida Bar Foundation, Fort Lauderdale, on behalf of the Florida Bar Foundation, Inc. and twenty-five active members of the Florida Bar.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, Tallahassee, Leonard H. Gilbert, President, Tampa, and John A. Boggs, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, of The Florida Bar; and Bill Wagner, Chairman, Florida Bar Integration Rule and Bylaws Committee, Tampa, on behalf of the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to article XIII of the Integration Rule, the Florida Bar Foundation, Inc. and twenty-five active members of The Florida Bar have petitioned the Court for modifications of the Integration Rule with respect to interest on lawyers' trust accounts. Simultaneously, the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar has petitioned the Court to suspend the operation of existing Integration Rule 11.02(4)(d) pending revisions thereto, and to add to Rule 11.02(4) an express authorization for the investment of individual clients' funds on their behalf.

In 1978 we amended the Integration Rule to permit lawyers to earn interest on their trust accounts. In re Interest on Trust Accounts, 356 So.2d 799 (Fla. 1978).[1] The bar foundation now requests amendments designed to reflect changes in the banking laws, which permit interest bearing checking accounts in Florida, and to overcome income tax problems expressed by the Internal Revenue Service regarding the applicability to income producing trust accounts of the "assignment of income" doctrine. The bar does not take a position with respect to these amendments, but requests that we delete the existing rule because of the confusion it has created among Florida attorneys during the time it has remained inoperative. The bar's position is well taken.

In order to obtain comments and views from affected and interested parties, petitioners request that we publish the proposed amendments, and that we set a time period to receive written views and comments.

The bar foundation's amendments to our trust account opinion and to Integration Rule 11.02(4)(d), which have been represented to satisfy conditions of the Internal Revenue Service prerequisite to IRS' approval of trust account plans in Florida, are appended to this order. The bar's proposed amendment to Rule 11.02(4), creating a new subsection (f), is also appended.

We hereby publish these proposals for comment, and we direct interested persons to submit their views in writing not later than May 15, 1981. Petitioners shall have until May 25 to respond to any written submissions, following which we will hear oral arguments on the proposals at 9:30 a.m. on June 2, 1981.

In the meantime, the operation of Integration Rule 11.02(4)(d) in its present form is suspended until further order of the Court. That Rule shall not be used by attorneys in Florida either to create or to maintain trust savings accounts.

It is so ordered.

SUNDBERG, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

(a) A modification in the procedures outlined in the 1978 Opinion is requested. *720 In place of paragraph 6, on page 15 of the Opinion (356 So.2d at 807) the following language is requested:
6. Interest earned on trust accounts, as defined in paragraph 5 above, containing client balances that are nominal in amount or held for short periods of time shall be paid to the Florida Bar Foundation, Inc., for its charitable purposes. Maintenance of such trust account balances in non-interest-bearing trust accounts will not be permitted. Attorneys will remain free to exercise their discretion to arrange special investments not limited to savings accounts for advances not described in the preceding sentences for the funds of their clients when appropriate;
(b) A modification of section 11.02(4)(d) of the Integration Rule is proposed as follows:

(d) Trust Savings Accounts. A member of the Florida Bar who elects to create or maintain a trust savings account shall comply with the following provisions, who in the course of the professional practice of law receives or disburses trust funds, shall create and maintain an interest-bearing demand trust account and shall deposit therein all client funds to the extent permitted by applicable banking laws, that are nominal in amount or are on deposit for a short period of time. The attorney shall comply with the following provisions:

(i) A trust savings the interest bearing demand trust account may be established with any bank or savings and loan association authorized by federal or state law to do business in Florida and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation.

(ii) Except as otherwise required by law, funds in each trust savings account shall be subject to withdrawal, or to transfer to a trust checking account, upon request and without delay. Any depository institution permitted by law to require advance notification (30 or 60 days) before allowing with drawal of savings deposits is nonetheless eligible to act as a depository for trust savings accounts under this rule if it meets the requirements of paragraph (i) above, provided the institution has not acted to delay the withdrawal of deposited funds (other than for the clearance of deposited funds or for good cause attributable to the circumstances of the particular depositer rather than the institution's financial needs or general policy) at any time during the past five years. An otherwise qualified institution which has not been in existence for five full years may serve as a trust savings account depository if it has met the requirements of this subsection throughout its existence.

(iii) An institution shall cease to be eligible for the receipt of trust savings funds at such time as it fails to qualify under paragraphs (i) or (ii). Any lawyer or law firm maintaining trust savings account against which immediate withdrawal rights are refused shall immediately notify the Florida Bar Foundation, Inc. of the name and address of the depository institution and the date of such refusal.

(iv) If, pursuant to governing law or banking regulations, a depository institution requires notice in writing for an intended withdrawal not less than 30 days before such withdrawal is made, the lawyer or law firm may certify to The Florida Bar Foundation, Inc. that the client's funds detained as a result of the depository institution's notification requirement are needed immediately for the client's affairs.

(A) Upon receiving such certification, the Foundation shall be authorized to advance to the certifying lawyer or law firm, from the interest earned on trust savings accounts, an amount of money necessary to meet the client's emergency needs subject, however, to limitations expressed in subparagraph (C).

(B) Simultaneously with certification, the lawyer or law firm shall direct the depository institution in writing, with a copy to the Foundation, that upon the expiration of the notification period detained funds equal to the amount advanced by the Foundation shall be remitted directly to the Foundation.

*721 (C) The Board of Directors of the Foundation may adopt rules of procedure reasonably necessary to implement the authority provided in subparagraph (A) and to assure full reimbursement of sums advanced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Bar v. McAtee
601 So. 2d 1199 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
In Re Interest on Lawyer's Trust Accounts
648 S.W.2d 480 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1983)
In re New Hampshire Bar Ass'n & New Hampshire Bar Foundation
453 A.2d 1258 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1982)
Matter of Interest on Trust Accounts
402 So. 2d 389 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
396 So. 2d 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-interest-on-trust-accounts-fla-1981.