Maryland v. United States Tandy Corporation v. United States North American Telephone Association v. United States Illinois v. United States
460 U.S. 1001, 103 S. Ct. 1240, 75 L. Ed. 2d 472, 51 U.S.L.W. 3632, 35 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1341, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 3639
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 28, 1983
Docket82-952; 82-953; 82-992; 82-1001
StatusPublished
Cited by324 cases
This text of 460 U.S. 1001 (Maryland v. United States Tandy Corporation v. United States North American Telephone Association v. United States Illinois v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Maryland v. United States Tandy Corporation v. United States North American Telephone Association v. United States Illinois v. United States, 460 U.S. 1001, 103 S. Ct. 1240, 75 L. Ed. 2d 472, 51 U.S.L.W. 3632, 35 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1341, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 3639 (1983).
Opinions
Affirmed on appeals from D. C. D. C. Reported below: 552 F. Supp. 131.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Combs
270 S.W.3d 249 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Qwest Corp. v. City of Bellevue
166 P.3d 667 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)
Dieca Communications, Inc. v. Florida Public Service Commission
447 F. Supp. 2d 1281 (N.D. Florida, 2006)
Qwest Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Department of Revenue
2006 WY 35 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2006)
Verizon Directories Corp. v. Yellow Book USA, Inc.
338 F. Supp. 2d 422 (E.D. New York, 2004)
United States v. Microsoft Corp.
215 F. Supp. 2d 1 (District of Columbia, 2002)
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
535 U.S. 467 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Covad Communications Co. v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
201 F. Supp. 2d 123 (District of Columbia, 2002)
Ting v. AT & T
182 F. Supp. 2d 902 (N.D. California, 2002)
Beville v. Curry
2001 OK 1 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2001)
United States v. Enova Corp.
107 F. Supp. 2d 10 (District of Columbia, 2000)
Discon, Inc. v. Nynex Corp.
86 F. Supp. 2d 154 (W.D. New York, 2000)
Stewart v. Nynex Corp.
78 F. Supp. 2d 172 (S.D. New York, 1999)
Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.
527 U.S. 308 (Supreme Court, 1999)
At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board
525 U.S. 366 (Supreme Court, 1999)
City of Dallas v. GTE Southwest, Inc.
980 S.W.2d 928 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Systems Council EM-3 v. AT & T Corp.
972 F. Supp. 21 (District of Columbia, 1997)
United States v. the Thomson Corp.
949 F. Supp. 907 (District of Columbia, 1996)
United States v. Alex. Brown & Sons, Inc.
169 F.R.D. 532 (S.D. New York, 1996)
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Metro-Link Telecom, Inc.
919 S.W.2d 687 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
460 U.S. 1001, 103 S. Ct. 1240, 75 L. Ed. 2d 472, 51 U.S.L.W. 3632, 35 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1341, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 3639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maryland-v-united-states-tandy-corporation-v-united-states-north-american-scotus-1983.