Martinez v. La Fox, BP, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois
DecidedDecember 18, 2018
Docket1:18-cv-00299
StatusUnknown

This text of Martinez v. La Fox, BP, Inc. (Martinez v. La Fox, BP, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez v. La Fox, BP, Inc., (N.D. Ill. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CLAUDIA MARTINEZ, on behalf of ) Case No. 18-cv-299 herself and others similarly situated ) , ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Honorable Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman ) ) ) LA FOX BP, INC and WAQAR QURESHI ) individually, ) ) Defendants. ) PROVE UP OF DAMAGES FOR DEFAULT Plaintiff Claudia Martinez submits the following by and through their attorney, Jorge Sanchez in support of her claim for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Illinois Minimum Wage Law and submit the following in support thereof. 1. Plaintiff Claudia Martinez, has executed a declaration (attached as Exhibit A) detailing the amount of wages owing and due to her. 2. Plaintiff Martinez is owed $4644 in unpaid overtime wages by Defendants Quereshi and LA FOX BP, Inc. 3. The wages are owed to her since April of 2017. 4. Plaintiffs also attach to this filing a spread sheet (Exhibit B) which totals the amounts of unpaid wages, liquidated damages in an amount equal to the unpaid wages, and 2% interest per month for the time the wages have gone unpaid. 5. The Plaintiff’s total damages which she seek this Court to award her are $11,474 jointly and severally by Defendants Quereshi and LA FOX BP, Inc. 6. Additionally, Plaintiffs request that this Court enter an award of attorneys’ fees of $6162.5 which equals 14.5 hours of attorney time spent by Plaintiffs’ counsel at a rate of $425/hour. Plaintiff attaches to this motion as Exhibit C a declaration and supporting exhibits to which 7. go to the determination of Counsel’s hourly rate.

8. Plaintiffs request that the Court issue an order finding Defendants liable for a total of $17.636.5 representing $11,474 damages, penalties and interest to Plaintiff and

$6162.5 in attorneys’ fees. By: /s/ Jorge Sanchez One of Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Jorge Sanchez Lopez & Sanchez LLP 77 W. Washington St., Suite 1313 Chicago, IL 60602 attysanchez@gmail.com 312-420-6784 Dated: December 18, 2018 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

CLAUDIA MARTINEZ, on behalf of ) Case No. 18-cv-299 herself and others similarly situated ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Honorable Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman ) ) ) LA FOX BP, INC and WAQAR QURESHI _ ) individually, ) ) Defendants. )

DECLARATION OF CLAUDIA MARTINEZ

I, Claudia Martinez, hereby declare as follows:

1. I am the Plaintiff in the above case. 2. I worked for Defendants LA FOX BP, INC and WAQAR QURESHI from November 1, 2016 through April 8 2017. 3. When I worked for Defendants they failed to pay me all the wages that were due to me on account of my having worked for him. They never paid any overtime compensation despite my working substantially more hours than 40 hours per week. 4. I have calculated that Defendants failed to pay me a total of $4644 for work I performed and was not paid for. 5. All of the foregoing I declare to be true. Bp cabyn Zn Dated: December 15, 2018

straight time interest #of owed 40 overtime owed amount amount months*.02* Week ending Hours hrs*$9/hr (83‐40) hrs*13.5 paid due monthly pay 1‐Nov‐16 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 8‐Nov‐16 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 15‐Nov‐16 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 22‐Nov‐16 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 29‐Nov‐16 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 464.4 6‐Dec‐16 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 13‐Dec‐16 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 20‐Dec‐16 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 27‐Dec‐16 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 356.04 3‐Jan‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 10‐Jan‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 17‐Jan‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 24‐Jan‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 31‐Jan‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 425.7 7‐Feb‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 14‐Feb‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 21‐Feb‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 28‐Feb‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 406.35 7‐Mar‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 14‐Mar‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 21‐Mar‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 28‐Mar‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 387 4‐Apr‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 11‐Apr‐17 83 360 580.5 940.5 193.5 147.06 Overtime pay owed 4644 2186.55 Liquidated damages 4644 Interest 2186.55 Total 11474.55 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CLAUDIA MARTINEZ, on behalf of ) Case No. 18-cv-299 herself and others similarly situated ) , ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Honorable Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman ) ) ) LA FOX BP, INC and WAQAR QURESHI ) individually, ) ) Defendants. ) DECLARATION OF JORGE SANCHEZ I, Jorge Sanchez, affirm and state that the following is true and correct: 1. I am one of the attorneys for plaintiffs in the above case. 2. I received a B.A. from Brown University in 1989 and a J.D. from University of California Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law in May 1995. 3. At Boalt Hall I served as a researcher for Professor Angela Harris and served as articles editor and an editor for the La Raza Law Journal. 4. I was admitted to the Illinois State Bar and Northern District of Illinois in January 1998. 1 have also been admitted to the following courts: the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, United States District Court for Eastern District of Wisconsin, the United States District Court for Western District of Wisconsin, the United States District Court for Northern District of Indiana; the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; the United States District Court for the Central District of Pennsylvania; the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska and the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. 5. 1 have more than 20 years of legal and litigation experience and have split my career largely between the law firm Despres Schwartz and Geoghegan and the civil rights non-profit MALDEF, and co-founded my current firm Lopez & Sanchez, LLP in September 2016. 6. At the Despres law firm I litigated a number of employment and civil rights cases across

a broad range of areas of law including the WARN Act, ERISA, Title VII, Section 1983, LMRDA, False Claims Act, and Section II of the Voting Rights Act. 7. Three cases in which I was the principle author of the appellate briefs and argued on appeal have been published in official reporters. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen v. Union Pacific R. Co., 500 Fad 591, (Cir. 7th Cir 2007)(overturing motion to dismiss and ordering enforcement of arbitration award under the Railway Labor Act); Pena v. American Meat Packing Corp., 362 F.3d 418, (Cir. 7th Cir 2004) (overturning grant of summary judgment in a WARN Act case); Boyd v. Illinois State Police, 384 F.3d 888 (Cir. 7th 2004)(upholding verdict on basis of harmless error but finding that jury instructions given in Title VII case were erroneous as plaintiff had argued).

8. Additionally I was a contributing author and principle editor in the case Hallinan v. Fraternal Order of Police Chicago Lodge 7, 570 F.3d 811 (7th Cir. 2009), and the sole author in Gonzalez v. City of Aurora, 535 F.3d 594 (7th Cir. 2008). I argued both cases before the Court of Appeals. 9. Other reported decisions resulting from my efforts include U.S. v. National Training and Information Center, Inc., 532 F.Supp.2d 946 (N.D.111., 2007)(granting in part my motion to dismiss a False Claims Act complaint); US. ex rel. Salmeron v. Enterprise Recovery Systems, Inc., 464 F.Supp.2d 766, (N.D.III., 2006)(denying defendant's motion to dismiss my False Claims Act complaint); Pena v. American Meat Packing Corp., 258 F.Supp.2d 864, (N.D.I1I., 2003)(overtumed by my subsequent appeal); Kozlowski v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moses Boyd, Jr. v. Illinois State Police
384 F.3d 888 (Seventh Circuit, 2004)
United States v. National Training & Information Center, Inc.
532 F. Supp. 2d 946 (N.D. Illinois, 2007)
Kozlowski v. Fry
238 F. Supp. 2d 996 (N.D. Illinois, 2002)
Pena v. American Meat Packing Corp.
258 F. Supp. 2d 864 (N.D. Illinois, 2003)
Dickieson v. DER Travel Service, Inc.
149 F. Supp. 2d 1011 (N.D. Illinois, 2001)
Gonzalez, Sam v. City of Aurora
535 F.3d 594 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Martinez v. La Fox, BP, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-la-fox-bp-inc-ilnd-2018.