FEDERAL · 29 U.S.C. · Chapter 23
Administration and enforcement of requirements
29 U.S.C. § 2104
This text of 29 U.S.C. § 2104 (Administration and enforcement of requirements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
29 U.S.C. § 2104.
Text
(a)Civil actions against employers
(1)Any employer who orders a plant closing or mass layoff in violation of section 2102 of this title shall be liable to each aggrieved employee who suffers an employment loss as a result of such closing or layoff for—
(A)back pay for each day of violation at a rate of compensation not less than the higher of—
(i)the average regular rate received by such employee during the last 3 years of the employee's employment; or
(ii)the final regular rate received by such employee; and
(B)benefits under an employee benefit plan described in section 1002(3) of this title, including the cost of medical expenses incurred during the employment loss which would have been covered under an employee benefit plan if the employment loss had not occurred.
Such liability
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Allen v. Sybase, Inc.
468 F.3d 642 (Tenth Circuit, 2006)
Guippone v. BH S & B Holdings LLC
737 F.3d 221 (Second Circuit, 2013)
International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Tennessee Valley Authority
108 F.3d 658 (Sixth Circuit, 1997)
Grocery Haulers, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (In re Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.)
467 B.R. 44 (S.D. New York, 2012)
Cashman v. Dolce International/Hartford, Inc.
225 F.R.D. 73 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
United Steelworkers v. North Star Steel Co.
5 F.3d 39 (Third Circuit, 1993)
Marques v. Telles Ranch, Inc.
131 F.3d 1331 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Viator v. Delchamps Inc.
109 F.3d 1124 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
Alberts v. Nash Finch Co.
245 F.R.D. 399 (D. Minnesota, 2007)
Conrad v. Charles Town Races, Inc.
521 S.E.2d 537 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1999)
Young v. Fortis Plastics, LLC
294 F.R.D. 128 (N.D. Indiana, 2013)
Teamsters Local 838 v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
156 F.3d 854 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
Kettell v. Bill Heard Enterprises, Inc. (In re Bill Heard Enterprises, Inc.)
400 B.R. 795 (N.D. Alabama, 2009)
Cruz v. HMR Foods Holding, LP (In re HMR Foods Holding, LP)
602 B.R. 855 (D. Delaware, 2019)
Schroeder v. Global Aviation Holdings, Inc. (In re Global Aviation Holdings, Inc.)
483 B.R. 54 (E.D. New York, 2012)
Austen v. Catterton Partners V, LP
268 F.R.D. 146 (D. Connecticut, 2010)
United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc.
50 F.3d 1426 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers v. Hanlin Group, Inc. (In re Hanlin Group, Inc.)
185 B.R. 703 (D. New Jersey, 1995)
Halkias v. General Dynamics Corp.
899 F. Supp. 295 (N.D. Texas, 1995)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 100–379, §5, Aug. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 893.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Aug. 4, 1988, see section 11 of Pub. L. 100–379, set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Aug. 4, 1988, see section 11 of Pub. L. 100–379, set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 U.S.C. § 2104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/29/2104.