Martin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Martin v. State

28 S.W.2d 140, 115 Tex. Crim. 618, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 615

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 23, 1930

DocketNo. 13286.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 S.W.2d 140 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. State, 28 S.W.2d 140, 115 Tex. Crim. 618, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 615 (Tex. 1930).

Pincite

Opinions

Conviction is supposed to be for an aggravated assault, with punishment by fine of $25.00.

The state's attorney calls to our attention the fact that no notice of appeal is shown by the record. This is absolutely essential. Art. 827, C. C. P.; Palmer v. State, 141 S.W. 109; Gentry v. State, 10 S.W.2d 732; See Notes under Art. 827, Vol. 3, Vernon's Tex. C. C. P.

A hasty examination of the record further reveals that it shows no judgment of conviction. It does show the verdict of the jury, but if judgment was entered thereon the record fails to bring it forward. Donegan v. State, 89 Tex.Crim. R.;230 S.W. 166; Cane v. State, 91 Tex.Crim. R., 239 S.W. 948; Kolos v. State, 90 Tex.Crim. R., 236 S.W. 473. For other authorities see Note 4, Sec. 123, Vol. 4, Texas Jurisprudence.

The transcript shows an "information," but no "complaint" is found furnishing a basis for the information.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI