Martin v. State
Opinions
Conviction is supposed to be for an aggravated assault, with punishment by fine of $25.00.
The state's attorney calls to our attention the fact that no notice of appeal is shown by the record. This is absolutely essential. Art. 827, C. C. P.; Palmer v. State,
A hasty examination of the record further reveals that it shows no judgment of conviction. It does show the verdict of the jury, but if judgment was entered thereon the record fails to bring it forward. Donegan v. State, 89 Tex.Crim. R.;
The transcript shows an "information," but no "complaint" is found furnishing a basis for the information.
The appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
28 S.W.2d 140 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.